Barbara Hirschbäck engaged legal representation through her former son-in-law, Attorney Dr. Schuberth of Zell am See, due to the counterfeit power of attorney “Kuppelwieser-Hirschbäck” in the estate of Lydia Wagner. With a motion dated February 1, 1996, to the District Court Donaustadt, Barbara Hirschbäck requested the correction of the first name of the mother of the plaintiff from “Elidia” to “Lydia” Wagner in the default judgment previously issued in her favor with the involvement of Brigitte Wagner, under file reference 6 C 886/95h.

As justification for this request, Barbara Hirschbäck presented a contract of sale from the deceased dated January 28, 1974, to the District Court Donaustadt, which involved the purchase of the property in Waldhausen that remained in the estate.

Remarkably, what stands out about this presented document is the absence of an official stamp from the responsible land registry office in Grein, Upper Austria.

Had Hirschbaeck copied this contract of sale at the land registry office, there would have been an obligatory stamp on this copy indicating the document number of the Grein land registry. Therefore, Hirschbaeck could not have obtained this document from the public land registry records.

Consequently, this contract of sale attributed to Lydia Wagner concerning her inherited property in Waldhausen, submitted by Hirschbaeck, can only originate from the private collection of documents belonging to the deceased Lydia Wagner. As a result, Hirschbaeck must have gained access to this private document, presumably in preparation for the jointly planned forgery of the will.

The mother of the second defendant testified in court that Hirschbaeck had visited the deceased before her passing. Consequently, Hirschbaeck had the specific opportunity to gain possession of this private document for the purpose of obtaining information about the details of the last official inherited property, which was part of the preparation for the planned forgery of the will.

This mistake made by Hirschbaeck regarding the land registry entry number of the inherited property of the deceased Lydia Wagner in Waldhausen, Upper Austria,

namely EZ 809 instead of EZ 882,

is also present in the text of the forged will.

This error by the forgers not only compellingly proves the forgery of the will, independently of the graphological forgery characteristics identified by experts, but also clearly exposes Hirschbäck as an imitative forger of Lydia Wagner’s handwriting in the forged will, as well as in the comparison samples, which were additionally forged to obstruct justice.

As evidence that Mrs. Lydia Wagner would never have included the incorrect entry number EU 809 for her property in Waldhausen, Upper Austria, in a genuine will, it is presented that Lydia Wagner had been personally preparing her income tax returns for this property since its purchase in 1974.

Over a period of 17 years, she consistently and naturally stated the correct entry number EZ 882 in her income tax declarations.

This serves to demonstrate that the inclusion of the false entry number EU 809 in the testament text is incongruous with Lydia Wagner’s historical and consistent documentation of the property’s entry number in her official records.